Clipping blog |
Clearing the Browser Tabs — Saturday Edition Posted: 23 Apr 2011 03:10 AM PDT This is the battleground for the 2012 election, as envisioned by political prophet Larry Sabato. Pay close attention to those tan states — they will be where the Democrats will want to pour money and people over the next year, and where they will seek to launch their most vicious attacks against any Republicans who have even a ghost of a chance of winning. My guess, though, is that they’ll have to change tactics fairly quickly because that’s not where the real fights will be. The Tea Parties will also be at work as they were in the last election, in places where the Democrats believe they are strong. And that’s when the election will really get fun! And now, links!
|
How Much Good Could Labor Union Leaders Do If They Cared? Posted: 22 Apr 2011 12:45 PM PDT It is an article of faith on the left that if we simply jacked taxes up on some random number of faceless and nameless rich people, we could magically turn that money into great-paying jobs for other people who aren’t rich. I’ve never been clear on the details of the plan, mostly because progressives always draw up just short of saying exactly how high a tax rate is just right or how we’ll turn this money into great-paying jobs, but I see it’s come up again in a press release by the AFL-CIO.
I applaud the very wealthy people who run the AFL-CIO for their concern for people who make far less money than they. I have suggested before that unions like the AFL-CIO could do a great deal of good in a tough economy if they waived their mandatory dues for just one year, but I’ve never tried to figure out just how much money that might leave in the pockets of workers. Fortunately, the author of this post at RedState has done something very similar. He looked at the number of union members, assumed they all paid a very conservative $50 a month in union dues, and figured out just how many jobs that money could have created, using the AFL-CIO’s own logic.
Uh oh! We might just have found a reason why labor union leaders don’t like talking about economic facts. See, unlike the salaries of Fortune 500 CEOs, the salaries of labor union leaders come directly from the pockets of poor and middle-class workers. Also, unlike those Fortune 500 CEO’s, labor union leaders don’t actually create jobs. They are, in fact, leeches on our economy and the paychecks of hard-working Americans. I would suggest that maybe 2011 will be the year that union leaders do the right thing and waive those mandatory dues for a year, but I live in the real world. That makes me quite different from the parasites who run the AFL-CIO |
You are subscribed to email updates from The Sundries Shack To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 |
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar