Jumat, 21 Oktober 2011

Clipping blog

Clipping blog


When the Inevitable Romney Attack Comes, Here’s Something to Remember

Posted: 21 Oct 2011 05:30 AM PDT

I figure it’s only a matter of time before the Democrats figure out that they can whip the wretched hive of slack and mopery that is Occupy Whatever into a frenzy over the “Wall Street” Presidential candidate Mitt Romney. Romney, as you may know, founded Bain Capital, a company that made a reputation for buying up financially troubled companies, stripping away the dead weight, laying off excess workers, and making the companies profitable. In other words, he’s one of those “banksters” the Occupy Whatever folks hate with a blazing white, union-stoked passion. It is a mortal lock that the Democrats will attack him for his ties to the company and the campaign donations he receives from his old associates.

When that attack comes, and so long as Romney is a threat to President Obama’s re-election efforts it will, we should remember this story.

Despite frosty relations with the titans of Wall Street, President Obama has still managed to raise far more money this year from the financial and banking sector than Mitt Romney or any other Republican presidential candidate, according to new fundraising data.
[...]

Obama's fundraising advantage is clear in the case of Bain Capital, the Boston-based private-equity firm that was co-founded by Romney, and where the Republican made his fortune. Not surprisingly, Romney has strong support at the firm, raking in $34,000 from 18 Bain employees, according to the analysis of data from the Center for Responsive Politics.

But Obama has outdone Romney on his own turf, collecting $76,600 from Bain Capital employees through September — and he needed only three donors to do it.

I can’t imagine how the Democrats are going to gin up anger at the Evil Republican Bankster Romney when the Innocent Lamb of a Peoples’ President Barack Obama took more than twice the cash from a sixth as many employees. What do you want to bet that the donations to Romney are from folks farther down the organizational chart and Obama’s three donors are very close to the top. Then again, the President and the Democrats are quite adept at raking in the cash from the wealthy.

Clearing the Browser Tabs – The Open Letter Gets Return Mail Friday Edition

Posted: 21 Oct 2011 03:10 AM PDT

My open letter to Herman Cain yesterday got a number of good responses from around the blogosphere. I want to direct you to several of them this morning by way of a more extensive Clearing the Browser Tabs post.

Oh, I have a few things I could post this morning, but I want to save them for longer posts later today and tomorrow.

And now, links!

  • Da Tech Guy is not happy with what Cain had to say about abortion yesterday morning even though Cain clarified his remarks later in the day. It was an unforced error that he should not have had to correct. Piers Morgan is not a friend and every interview with him should be treated with at least a minimal level of wariness.
  • Stacy McCain doesn’t think Cain’s campaign is on the edge of ruin quite as much as I do. he and I had a brief conversation tonight and he’s of the opinion that any mistakes Cain makes now, he can overcome when the primaries start. I’m not so sure of that. Cain’s lack of political experience can cut for him, as it has thus far, but it can cut hard against him as well. Voters have been willing this far to give him a chance to run with the professional politicians but if he shows he can’t learn quickly, they will dump him for a more polished candidate. He may get more slack than the others, but he won’t get a second chance.
  • The Lonely Conservative understands why Cain has been so willing to do as many MSM interviews as he has, and I think she’s right. Free publicity, especially national publicity, is worth a fortune to him.
  • Dan Collins certainly knows how to get my attention. He links to my blog, of course. What did you think I meant?

Let me also point you to another open letter, by Pajamas Media founder Roger Simon, addressed to all the candidates (via Instapundit). In short, he’d like them to spend more time as happy warriors and less time as rabid attack dogs. It is very good advice.

TwitterFacebookStumbleUponGoogle BookmarksDeliciousFriendFeedTechnorati FavoritesGoogle GmailRedditWordPressShare

An Open Letter to Herman Cain

Posted: 20 Oct 2011 12:20 PM PDT

Mr. Cain,

I don’t know if you remember me, but we’ve spoken three or four times. I supported your run for President before you actually declared. I was on board the Cain Train before there was even a train to board. Your limited government principles, faith in the American people, and common-sense ideas for good governance would help this country immensely.

But you have to get to the White House first. You know, as a successful businessman, that you can have all the big concepts right but still watch your plans crash and burn because of poor planning or flaws in execution. So far, the big concepts you’ve outlined have put you out in front, but you’re on the verge of a crash and burn and I don’t think you will get to the White House if you continue to do what you are doing.

I realize that’s a harsh thing to say, and I have very likely overstepped my bounds. I’m about as far from the kind of person a national candidate would hire as you can get: uncredentialed, unsophisticated, and without a multi-page political resume. However, I am a careful observer and, like you, I have spent much of my life solving problems. I see problems with your campaign and I’d like to help you solve them.

Some of your recent public comments, especially on the release of Gilad Shalit and the abortion issue, have hurt you among people who might otherwise be on your side. You’ve done well to clarify your comments, but the cycle of “speak then correct” has become common with your campaign. It can not become a habit. Voters do like politicians who correct themselves when they’ve said something wrong, but when it happens often, they will see that politician as unreliable and uninformed. You can not afford to be labeled as either one, not among Republicans who have reputations for stability and intelligence.

This might run against all your instincts, but you have to slow down in interviews. You do not need to answer every question a journalist asks. You are allowed to say, “I honestly don’t know”. You can acknowledge the difficulty of an issue and allow yourself some room to be less than decisive with your answer. For example, when Wolf Blitzer asked you about Gilad Shalit, you could have easily told him that you appreciated the difficulty of Prime Minister Netanyahu’s decision and that while you hold to the position that we should not negotiate with terrorists, you understand that there could well have been circumstances that caused Israel to do so.

Chiefly, you must remember that those journalists are not your friends. Even if they are not openly hostile to you, they want their interview with you to make big news. They hope to get their name in the headlines on Wednesday because of their interview with you on Sunday. You are no longer an interesting businessman or a talk show host but the man who wants to dethrone their beloved Barack Obama. They will not play fair. They will line up a series of “gotcha” questions to trap you. Don’t give them a chance and for goodness sake, don’t trap yourself. Like I said, that will be hard for you because you’ve built a reputation as a straight-shooter, but it’s a skill you’re going to have to learn fast.

That brings me to my second point. You need a solid inner circle. They don’t have to be famous. They don’t have to be political. They do have to be smart and willing to tell you things you may not want to hear. And you have to trust them implicitly. They will be the ones who prepare your for interviews by playing Devil’s Advocate with you. They will keep you abreast of the latest news. They will critique your public appearances so that the next one will be stronger and better. They will dig the choice facts out of your plans so that you can use then to fight back in debates (“Read my plan” is not nearly as good an answer as a brief but specific defense of your plan). They’ll find the flaws in your plans and help you shore them up well. I honestly don’t know if you have any of those people in your campaign, which tells me that you probably don’t. None of these people need to spend any time in front of a camera, but they are key to your electoral success. They will keep your sharp and informed. They will hone your message to a brutal sharpness.

Lastly, you have to get better on current events. You should never have been blindsided by the  Shalit story or by the right of return. I know you are a smart man, but you don’t look smart when you get sandbagged by a question the average blogger could have answered at least moderately well. Your poll numbers are still very good, even after a debate performance that should have sunk you,  but they won’t stay that way if you have another week like this week. This is where your inner circle can help you immensely. Just spend some time during the day in conversation with them about the news. You don’t have to drill deeply into the issues; table talk along will help give you the basic information you need. Put some of the topics for upcoming interviews on the table and kick them around over dinner. Those talks will help you more than you think, and they’ll help you relax a bit, too.

You can win the nomination. There isn’t a person in this race you can’t beat on the debate stage or at the ballot box. As you know, though, the other professional politicians in the race with you have had a huge head start. They know how to handle the press. They’ve been able to spend all their days on poltics and issues in a way you haven’t. You’re going to have to be sharper than all of them to take on Barack Obama next year. It’s a huge task, but I think you’re up to it, if you tighten up those areas where your campaign has been loose thus far.

Thank you for your time. Best of luck!

 

TwitterFacebookStumbleUponGoogle BookmarksDeliciousFriendFeedTechnorati FavoritesGoogle GmailRedditWordPressShare

Tidak ada komentar:

Posting Komentar