Clipping blog |
Clearing the Browser Tabs – Blogging vs Journalism Tuesday Edition Posted: 13 Sep 2011 03:10 AM PDT My friend Anna asked an interesting question about blogging vs journalism on Twitter and collected some interesting responses. I don’t think anyone hit on the right answer, or at least the answer that matches my observation, and my answer really was too snide but I didn’t have a lot of time to give a more detailed response. I’ll take a stab at it here. Both blogging and journalism are about the writer. I dare say that since at least the Watergate Era, most journalists come out of j-school with a desire to “make a difference” or “change the world”. If that’s not about the writer, I don’t know what is. It takes an incredible amount of ego to believe that and no one who does is going to truly treat any story as more important. Stories will always be a means by which the crusading journalist climbs higher and higher up the career ladder until they get to a point at which they can cover world-changing stories. But even that’s not enough. You can see journalists every day on the cable networks who flit from story to story like hummingbirds on crank. They don’t dig to the heart of the stories. They rarely come back and follow up on them. The stories aren’t important; the career and the ego are. Of course, bloggers are often guilty of the same sin. We want to climb the ladder, too. Many of us would love a full-time writing gig and plenty of us have jumped into high-profile stories in the hopes that someone farther up the line will notice us. Writers write for ego. That’s just the way it is. The thing is, bloggers are far more honest about it. That is the essential difference between reporters and bloggers. Don’t forget The Delivery tonight at 9:30 PM Eastern. I’ll mark my second anniversary as a podcaster and I’ll have a guest with me for the second half who was instrumental in my decision to start the show. He’s also a pretty neat guy and you’ll like him, so be sure to get into the chatroom tonight! And now, links!
|
You Can Call It “Tea Party”, but That Doesn’t Make It Tea Party Posted: 12 Sep 2011 07:10 PM PDT I didn’t watch the Presidential debate last night. I even shut down my Twitter feed so I wouldn’t have to spend an hour ranting about it. Oh, I wouldn’t have had a problem with the candidates. I think they’ll all acquit themselves just fine and, if I need to, I’ll read the debate transcript tomorrow and pick out the good parts. I have a problem with the fact that CNN was involved with it. Oh, I get that the Tea Party Express was burning up to get themselves hooked up with a mainstream media outlet. It has to be tough living under an assumed grassroots name when you have all those big media dreams. But CNN? The network behind the wickedly-biased YouTube debate in 2007? Aside from MS-NBC, you’d be hard-pressed to find a new outlet that’s been more openly hostile to the Tea Parties than CNN over the past two years. Let me remind you of a few examples.
That is the network to which The Tea Party Express eagerly and deliberately lent the Tea Party name. That is the network that will make happy talk tonight and savage the Tea Parties — average, everyday Americans who don’t want to hand their kids a mortgage-level debt burden on the day they are born — just as soon as they possibly can. But hey, they got their name on television, which makes it all okay, doesn’t it?
|
You are subscribed to email updates from The Sundries Shack To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 |
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar