Clipping blog |
Stripped-Down Grannies, Curly Bulbs, and What’s Next? Posted: 05 Dec 2011 07:10 AM PST
And so it has not. In less than a month, on January 1, your government is going to take some of your light bulbs away from you. First, you won’t be able to buy 100-watt incandescent bulbs, then go the 75-watt models. By January of 2014, Washington will take away even 40-watt bulbs. You’ll have to settle for compact fluorescent bulbs or terribly expensive LED bulbs. Mind you, consumers do not want these light bulbs. We did not ask to be shoved into buying them. We do not want the normal incandescent bulbs to go away. Many of us will be hoarding them. But Congress, in its massive heaps of stupidity, has decided it knows what is best for us. So, starting next year, you lose another piece of our freedom — admittedly a small one — and the government intrudes just a little bit more into your daily affairs. Are you tired of being pushed around by your government yet? All the little indignities starting to become a bit too much? No? Just wait. They will, and by then you might not have the power to take your life back. Today, it’s a TSA scanner and a couple government goons who strip grannie to her skivvies. Next year it’s something else. The year after that, well, let’s hope that the election in 2012 changes a couple things beyond who our President is. Let’s hope we scale Big Daddy Government back to something that serves us instead of the other way around. |
Another Reason the Candidates Should Shun the “Donald Trump” Debate: Eason Jordan Posted: 05 Dec 2011 06:15 AM PST
Now, it seems, some of the candidates are going to walk into a debate that couldn’t be more clearly marked as a trap if it had a big neon sign hanging over it with flashing arrows and air horns. For this debate, hosted by the conservative news outlet Newsmax and televised by the ION cable network, we will get famed attention whore Donald Trump as our moderator and former CNN news exec Eason Jordan as Executive Producer. You remember Eason Jordan, don’t you? No? Well, let Michelle Malkin remind you.
I spent a lot of time on Easongate in 2005. It was a scandal that should have rocked the world of major media, the sort of story that would have dominated the headlines if Jordan has been the head of Fox News. Instead, most news services ignored it. Those that did report on the story did so as a “he said/he said” issue else they castigated the blogger who originally reported Jordan’s slander. In the end, Jordan resigned, and we got the very best look at how the MSM protects its own no matter what heinous things they may say or do. And now the GOP is going to let Jordan produce on of its debate. In what world does that make a lick of sense? Newsmax ought to know better, and if it doesn’t drop Jordan from the production, we ought to shame it then shun it. That goes for the candidates as well. I know that a couple of the candidates, Newt Gingrich for one, have already agreed to do the debate. They should pull out of it and name Jordan as a prime reason for doing so. I would be very disappointed in Gingrich if he stayed in once he learned that Jordan was involved. The man is not fit to work on any respectable news event, as a reporter, a producer, or even a janitor. He cozens tyrants and hates our soldiers. Is that too strong? Too bad. That is his history and he’s given us no reason to believe he’s changed one whit. I’m tired of the right’s insistence that we treat the MSM like they have our best interest at heart. They don’t. They are four square on the side of the progressives who have nearly destroyed our economy and we owe them no deference at all. We conservatives made Eason Jordan an example once. It’s time we did it again. |
You are subscribed to email updates from The Sundries Shack To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 |
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar