Kamis, 24 November 2011

Clipping blog

Clipping blog


Happy Thanksgiving, Everyone!

Posted: 24 Nov 2011 07:10 AM PST

Happy Thanksgiving, everyone! I hope that you spend the day surrounded by family and friends, or some pleasant combination of both.

As has become tradition around here, I’m posting the finest Thanksgiving entertainment I’ve ever seen — the “Turkeys Away” episode of WKRP in Cincinnati. I hope you enjoy it as much as I do.

Also, you might enjoy this episode of Jenny Erikson’s old podcast The Smart Girl Report from 2009. She spent about 40 minutes talking with James the Pilgrim from America’s distant past. For reasons probably related to the strange time-traveling technology that allowed Jenny to send her cell phone back to the year 1621 (or maybe 1622), the Pilgrim’s British accent is not always as British as you might expect. Any similarity in those no-accented moments to a more familiar voice is entirely coincidental, I’m sure. You might also want to employ a few of Dan Collins’ helpful hints for a harmonious Thanksgiving.

Finally, please spend a few minutes today remembering our soldiers who are far from home and say a prayer for their safe return. They’ve spend years of their lives for us they can never get back; they deserve the very best we can do for them and thousands upon thousands of prayers can’t hurt at all.

Enjoy the day and be sure to check back at The Shack later this evening and tomorrow for more posts, which will include a post full of handy ways you can put a little money in my pocket while you do your online Black Friday shopping.

Thank you for your support throughout the year and God bless you all!

Selasa, 22 November 2011

Clipping blog

Clipping blog


Tighten Up Your Cumberbatch; Here Comes Sherlock!

Posted: 22 Nov 2011 09:12 AM PST

Rejoice, ye fans of Sherlock, for the show is returning! PBS finally announced when American viewers can get their next fix of the superlative British series that teased us to distraction over a year ago.

From MASTERPIECE MYSTERY!, premiering at 9:00 p.m. May 6 and continuing through May 20, Sherlock Holmes stalks again in the three-part "Sherlock, Series 2." This modern version, set in 21st-century London, stars Benedict Cumberbatch (War Horse) as the go-to consulting detective and Martin Freeman (The Hobbit) as his loyal friend, Dr. John Watson.

Yep, folks, it’s back. Finally. When last we saw the remixed detective and his faithful assistant/doctor/soldier/romantic basket case, they were by a swimming pool with an exploding vest. Wait, should I have thrown up a spoiler alert there? Probably not. At some point, you figure there’ll be a swimming pool and an exploding vest. Anyhow, that was in early November of 2010, which means that they’ve been held in a superposition of television character states for over a year now, like Schrödinger’s Detectives .

To be fair, the folks behind the series – Stephen Moffat and Mark Gatiss — have been just a teensy bit busy turning British television into a juggernaut of quality entertainment which mere presence should shame Hollywood into an embarrassed silence.

If you haven’t seen Sherlock, you should, even if you’re not a fan of the original (or the incredibly good version that starred Jeremy Brett as the finest Holmes I’ve ever seen). You can nab the DVD set for very little on Amazon. If you do, I’ll get a little bit of the sale price, so do check it out or buy it for a friend who will shower you with gratitude afterwards.

TwitterFacebookStumbleUponGoogle BookmarksDeliciousFriendFeedTechnorati FavoritesGoogle GmailRedditWordPressShare

The Delivery Presents – How Green is My Podcast?

Posted: 22 Nov 2011 06:10 AM PST

I’ve said it before, but the real perk to having my own podcast is that I can bring on guests I like, for as long as I like. Episode 121 is a fine example of that truism, as I brought Stephen Green to the show for a whole hour and let our conversation wander wherever it willed. Steve was a bit under the weather with some post-Blog Con crud, but he came through spectacularly.

We did quite a bit of topical wandering in this show — from Occupy Whatever, TARP, and big government in the first half to zombies, the greatness of John Carpenter, and a frenzied summation of the link between Buckaroo Banzai and Jack Burton in the second. I’ll have Steve back very soon to continue what we couldn’t quite finish in the second half of the show. If you’re a movie lover, you’ll want to watch out for that show!

So that’s the show. Pick a half, jump in, and be sure to listen to the whole thing. Oh, and tell all your friends, because I’m pushing hard for some amazing end of the year listener numbers!

The Delivery - Episode 121

This posting includes an audio/video/photo media file: Download Now

Your Fiscal Fright of the Month

Posted: 21 Nov 2011 09:41 PM PST

Now that the Super Committee has done its little song and dance, it’s time for the grown-ups to get a nice, clear view of our problems. One of those problems is our entitlement system, especially Medicare and Social Security. The Democrats steadfastly refuse to admit either of them are any cause for concern but, as Jim Pethokoukis found, they’re full of hooey. Here is the conclusion of a Citigroup analysis of the situation.

Quite simply, if Medicare as we know it and social security are to remain, the taxes collected to finance these programs are woefully short. Social Security already runs an operating deficit. Its assets are U.S. Treasury securities that have not been issued to the public, but will be matched with marketed securities when payments come due, as the public was subtly reminded as the debt ceiling was hit in August.

As figures 1 illustrates, the 6.2% payroll tax, prior to its "one year" cut in 2011, covers roughly one fourth of the present value of total future Medicare and Social Security obligations as extrapolated by Federal actuaries. The unfunded portion of these programs is now valued at $78 trillion through the future. Fully funding these entitlements will require huge program reforms or sharply higher taxes.

Would you like that in a frightening graphic? Here you go.

That graphic doesn’t include the parts of Medicare and Social Security that we do have funded right now. Toss those in, and the big orange circles get even bigger, by quite a lot.

So, can we get serious about our country’s financial problems now, or shall we wait until those big orange circles consume every dime we produce?

TwitterFacebookStumbleUponGoogle BookmarksDeliciousFriendFeedTechnorati FavoritesGoogle GmailRedditWordPressShare

In Praise of Police Restraint and Pepper Spray

Posted: 21 Nov 2011 04:51 PM PST

Credit: Randy L. Rasmussen, The Oregonian

By now, you’ve probably seen what the MSM will ensure becomes an iconic photograph from an Occupy Whatever protest in Portland, OR this weekend. A young woman, screaming defiance at the “banksters” and their greedy overlords, gets a full blast of pepper spray from a fascist police officer who overreacted to the “mostly peaceful” protest. In fact, the notion that the Occupy Whatever protests have been “mostly peaceful” (see reports on Occupy Oakland, Occupy Columbia, Occupy St. Louis, Occupy Wall Street, Occupy Portland (Maine), Occupy Denver, and Occupy Berkeley), has been reported in so many media reports that it is now accepted as fact, despite mountains of evidence to the contrary.
Take a look at this rap sheet compilation by John at Verum Serum, grouped by type of crime committed, Big Journalism’s more complete list of crimes committed by Occupiers, or reports of assaults (sexual and otherwise, including assaults on police officers) from some of those same Occupies locations and you’ll see the same thing that most of America has seen over the past month: the Occupy Whatever movement does not represent the American people and it never has.

With the “mostly peaceful” lie in mind, let’s take another look at that picture but this time, let’s take a few steps back. Thanks to a couple of hard-working Portland bloggers, Oregon Media Watch and Victoria Taft, we can. Let’s look at a screenshot taken from local news coverage of the crowd not long before the police pulled out the pepper spray (thank you, Victoria!).

I know it’s hard to make out details, but the police are in the lower right half of the screen and the protesters are pushing hard against them from the top and left. Behind the police is the Chase Bank the officers had been trying to clear of protesters who were there illegally.

Now, here’s the question I want you to ponder: where are the police supposed to go from here? They are pinned between a hostile crowd and a wall. Their ground is shrinking rapidly and if they don’t hold what they have, they’re going to be overrun. Remember, these protesters have been pushing them all day long. They’ve given ground for hours and, at this point in the day, they have no more to give.

What, exactly, are they supposed to do? Really, they only have two choices: break out the pepper-spray or use the batons of, God forbid, their guns. The options are lethal and non-lethal. They can not retreat any farther. They can not let the protesters in among them because that’s when officers get hurt, as they’ve been hurt in several other cities. Yet the MSM and their progressive buddies would rather the police….

…well, what would they rather the police do? Seriously, folks, what were the police supposed to do? Leave entirely and let the protesters trash the private property of the people they are paid to protect? Break out the batons and break some arms, legs, and heads? Get hurt themselves? I’m at a loss here. The truth is that when the police officers hit that girl flush in the face with pepper spray, they were using the lightest of all the tools at their disposal that would let them do their jobs and get home safely to their own families. I am absolutely sure none of those officers wanted to be in a situation where they had to pepper spray a young woman to do their job. Stereotypes aside, no police officer suits up for the day and bounces out the door, eager to beat down a few hippies. Instead, they’re focused on catching a couple real criminals — rapists, robbers, killers — and going home safely to their families when their shift is over. They sure as heck don’t relish spending the day babysitting a bunch of spoiled brats whose idea of political protest is to goad the police or to pile up 200 pounds of human feces near a city building that memorializes military veterans (via Instapundit).

Yet, there they were, pinned between a crowd of unruly and dangerous people and a wall. Given the choices, the police did exactly what they should have done. The woman in that picture could have taken a few baton blows in the ribs, knees, or head. She could have been trampled by panicked friends as the police dropped a couple protesters to protect themselves. Instead, she got swollen eyes and an extremely runny nose, and no lasting effects (see her mug shot here). Of course, the MSM won’t ever tell the story of what could have happened, but they should. Because it’s the truth.

TwitterFacebookStumbleUponGoogle BookmarksDeliciousFriendFeedTechnorati FavoritesGoogle GmailRedditWordPressShare

Kamis, 17 November 2011

Clipping blog

Clipping blog


Harry’s Newest Obsession is a Man Named Grover

Posted: 16 Nov 2011 10:38 PM PST

Harry Reid hates Grover Norquist. A lot.

If you’re not a political junkie, you’ve probably not heard of Norquist nor the group he heads called Americans for Tax Reform. ATR has a pretty simple goal — a simpler, lower, more fair tax code — and one of its tools is a pledge it asks candidates to sign wherein they promise not to raise taxes while in office. This is not a new thing; the pledge has been around for 25 years. In that time, it’s become a popular way of judging where a candidate stands on taxes. You can read both the federal and state versions of the pledge right here.

Harry Reid doesn’t like that pledge, nor does he like Norquist’s insistence that those who sign it actually abide by its provisions. See, Reid really, really wants to raise taxes, and not just on monocle-wearing rich people who steal nickels from babies and swim nightly in their lavish money bins. No, he wants to raise taxes on “the rich”, which in modern Democratic parlance means the 53 percent of Americans who actually pay taxes. And Grover Norquist is in his way, so Reid has fixated on him like Alicia Silverstone fixated on Cary Elwes in The Crush except that, thankfully, Reid hasn’t worn a bikini or short shorts.

Yet.

Reid invoked the Beast Norquist in a ‘media availability” on Monday to explain why the Republican’s generous offer of $300 billion in shiny new tax revenues simply wasn’t a good enough offer for his Joint Committee members to accept. (no link, unfortunately, but I’m working from a transcript).

Republicans have asked that we make some structural changes to entitlement programs. We told them in order to do that, there has to be some tax revenue in return. And we would need a break from Grover Norquist. But at — you’ve all seen what Grover Norquist has said the last day or two. I may just read some of these quotes, they’re priceless.

This is a quote in one of The Hill newspapers, Grover Norquist, the President of Americans for Tax Reform said the GOP proposal is merely a negotiating position. And that Republican leaders have assured him, they won’t raise taxes. Quote, “It’s not written down. It’s a negotiating position. It won’t pass the House or the Senate. I’ve talked to the House leadership and the Senate leadership. They’re not going to be passing any tax increases.”

It goes on like that for a while. At the end of Reid’s presser, one of the reporters noticed that Reid’s puss face was a little more puss than normal and asked him to give us a bit of encouragement.

QUESTION: What should the American people take away from this if you sound so dejected?

REID: Maybe they should impeach Grover Norquist.

The idea of Norquist as Lord of the Republicans has been a recurring theme lately for Reid, who has a strange fetishistic way of talking about the relationship. In the past few months, he has called Norquist the Republicans’ “leader” and puppet-master, their lover with whom they are “in touch”, the man who holds them “in thrall” and “in submission” with his “infamous” pledge, and the man who tells them what to do because they are “devoted to” or “terrified by” him. Now, I’m not saying that Reid pictures Norquist as a leather-clad bad boy who wields a crop (NTTAWWT!), but his analogies certainly have a particular theme going on, wouldn’t you say?

Look, Reid’s real problem with Norquist isn’t that he won’t give the Majority Leader the spanking he deserves but that he won’t shut up so that Reid can get all the big tax hikes he really wants. The Senate Democrats haven’t passed a budget for coming up on three years and that’s not Grover Norquist’s fault. Reid has all the power he wants to ram the spendiest, taxiest, greediest piece of budgetary crapulence down our throats any time he wants. He won’t do that because he knows there isn’t a single Republican who will go along with it and he needs a few to be on his side so that when Election Day comes around, he can hide behind them to avoid the justified wrath of the voters.

So far, the Republican’s aren’t playing exactly the game he wants them to play. They are willing (foolishly, in my opinion) to give him a big, fat tax hike but they want something in return. In Reid’s perverse little world, though, he’s the guy with the whip, which means he doesn’t have to compromise. But that lack of compromise leaves him vulnerable to political attack, so he’s constructed a new villain behind which he can hide — Grover Norquist.

The truth of the matter is that Norquist is no puppet master. He has a pledge and he intends to do what he can to make sure that everyone who signed the pledge keeps the pledge. That’s not villanous; that’s just honest.

Huh. Honesty. Well that explains why Harry Reid hates him so much.

TwitterFacebookStumbleUponGoogle BookmarksDeliciousFriendFeedTechnorati FavoritesGoogle GmailRedditWordPressShare