Kamis, 22 Desember 2011

Clipping blog

Clipping blog


I’m For Newt, and Here’s Why.

Posted: 21 Dec 2011 10:58 PM PST

I was going to write a long post, probably in the area of 3,000 words, about the candidates, and which one I like but I decided not to. Oh sure, I could toss in bullet points and section headers and give you something every bit as good as you’d find in your average conservative political magazine. I could wax on about who did what in the past and who cozied up to whom.

Would you really read that, though? For that matter, do you really care who I like for President?

Look, if you want detailed endorsements, I’ll point you to a few. I linked three excellent endorsements of Rick Perry in this post and you can add this early endorsement by Melissa Clouthier and this even-handed piece by Matt Newman to them.  Stacy McCain, Lisa Graas, Zilla Stevenson, and Pete Da Tech Guy have endorsed (or all but endorsed) Rick Santorum. Of course, you know how the more professional conservative crowd has gotten behind Mitt Romney including Ann Coulter, Governors Chris Christie and Nikki Haley, and, in a backhanded way, National Review. If you got behind any of those candidates, you’d have plenty of good reasons and you’d have the support of many smart people.

None of them are for me, though. Like I said on The Delivery a couple of weeks ago, we all have to decide what we want our President to do, then find that candidateswho we believe will get most of those things done. I have my list, and it’s a short one (it is also revised to account for Herman Cain’s retirement from the race. I guess I’ll have to wait to get someone who isn’t a career politician).

  1. Repeal Obamacare.
  2. Take the fight to the left, without pause or mercy.
  3. Carve into the size of government so that it’s smaller after four years than it is now.

As it stands, I believe all the candidates but one will take a legitimate run at Obamacare. I know that Mitt Romney has said he would, but I simply don’t believe him, not as long as he backs Romneycare as firmly as he does. Aside from him, though, I’ve not really narrowed down the field.

I also believe all the candidates, Romney included, will make the federal government smaller in some way than it is today. Some will cut more than others. Each of them will work in different areas of the government, though I’m certain they’ll all strip out business-killing regulations at some point in their administration. Again, I pretty much have the entire field from which to choose.

That leaves me with my second criterion, which is pretty important to me. I have no desire to relive the George W. Bush years, during which I and nearly every other conservative had to do his fighting for him because he was unwilling or unable to muster his own defense. His social security reform died because he didn’t sell it well. The left, and more than a few on the right, savaged our efforts in Iraq and Afghanistan because he could not push back against the often scurrilous attacks. I could not have endured another year of President Bush. I was tired. I imagine a lot of you were tired too. In fact, one of the biggest reasons John McCain lost to Barack Obama is because he would not attack Obama’s record, his checkered past, his repugnant associates, or his bog-standard socialist worldview.

So I want a fighter and I’m willing to let a few things slide to get one. I’m willing to overlook a man’s marital iniquities, committed decades ago. I’m willing to accept that I may have to fight my President on occasion to push him back on the right course. I realize that at times I may have to get between him and a compromise with the dishonest Nancy Pelosi or the weaselly Harry Reid.

By now, I’m sure you’ve guessed that I’ve chosen Newt Gingrich. Look, say what you will about some of the bad choices he’s made in the past (and if you want chapter and verse on them, you can get it from National Review’s Ramesh Ponnuru and Mark Steyn), but you can not deny that among all our present choices, he is the only one who has aggressively and consistently pushed back against the progressive left and their quislings in the media during the campaign. As I wrote earlier in the week, he fought when other candidates held their peace or whined for more attention. His record as Speaker is stuffed full of times when he shoved back hard against the Democrats and the status quo — the Contract with America, the balanced budgets he passed with a Democratic President, Welfare Reform that he had to push three times to get past that same President. He is the only man in my lifetime who was willing to shut down the entire government rather than let the left’s runaway spending go without challenge.

I support him for more than that, though. I support him because, for the most part, he’s won his fights. he is the only Republican politician I can remember in the last decade who backed down Nancy Pelosi, and it only took a couple of hours for him to do it. I also support him because he is the only candidate, now that Herman Cain is out of the race, who has not only pushed a series of positive messages about what this country can do with him in the Oval Office but has deliberately refrained from savaging his fellow candidates or those who support them. His control has frayed recently, after he came under simultaneous attack from four different candidates in the same week, but he’s holding it together pretty well. I admire that, and I would hope that you do, too.

I am not naive. I know that I will have to keep my eye on Gingrich should he be elected President. I know very well his impulse toward the technological solution and the grand idea. I know that his penchant for brainstorming out loud will lead to headlines that will make me, and most of the country, roll our eyes in disbelief. I know that he can easily come off as arrogant and too clever by half. I will not agree with him in every detail; in fact, I can tell you that I don’t. I have plenty of reasons not to like him. Then again, I have plenty of reasons not to like any of the candidates.

Despite all that, I prefer him to all the others. Much like Abraham Lincoln said of General Ulysses Grant, “He fights”. I want someone in the White House who won’t shy away from a fight over conservative principles. I want someone who will kick recalcitrant Congressional Republicans in the tail, like he did when he was Speaker of the House (and don’t think for a moment that they removed him from the position for any other reason than because he upset their apple carts). I want someone who will look Democrats in the eye, grin, and take them to school so quickly they barely have time to figure out how they lost.

I believe Newt Gingrich will be that man and so he has my support.

TwitterFacebookStumbleUponGoogle BookmarksDeliciousFriendFeedTechnorati FavoritesGoogle GmailRedditWordPressShare

Rabu, 21 Desember 2011

Clipping blog

Clipping blog


“The Hobbit” Trailer is Here! Now Sit Down and Wait.

Posted: 21 Dec 2011 06:15 AM PST

Gee, thanks, Hollywood, for giving me such a tasty trailer for The Hobbit, then making me wait a whole stinking year for it.

Like Moe said, it had better not suck.

Seriously, a whole year. And they have yet to show us Smaug.

Selasa, 20 Desember 2011

Clipping blog

Clipping blog


Big Bloggers Fall in Line for Rick Perry

Posted: 19 Dec 2011 05:40 PM PST

It looks as if some of the big blogs on the right have picked a candidate for 2012 and his name is Rick Perry.

Most of the core group of Red State writers laid out their case for the Texas Governor and while it’s not an official site endorsement, I’m not sure Erick Erickson would buck them to endorse someone else, though he is very much his own man. Here’s a bit of their piece.

If this website has a purpose – if any conservative website or publication has a purpose – it must begin with electing conservatives to significant public offices. We have the chance to nominate a conservative for president and win the White House in 2012. We can fumble that chance away by settling for a nominee we can't trust to pursue conservative policies in office, or we can make a stand for the best, most conservative potential president in the field. That's Rick Perry, and we enthusiastically endorse him to be the 45th President of the United States.

2012 is a year of enormous opportunity for conservatives. The sitting president is deeply unpopular and discredited, the economy is mired in the doldrums, and the public's trust in Washington and its traditional ways is at an all-time low. Tea Party-backed conservative successes in 2010 show that the public is willing to embrace candidates who dissent from the bipartisan consensus – a consensus that gives us an ever-growing federal government in general and too much federal interference and favoritism in the economy in particular. President Obama's deep unpopularity with independents, together with the growth of left-wing populist protest movements, shows that dissatisfaction with the status quo reaches far beyond the conservative base. But the failure of some Tea Party conservatives in 2010 is also a reminder that to win, we need candidates who are serious, experienced, and battle-tested. That's Rick Perry.

Ace and his co-bloggers also endorsed Perry.

Gingrich and Romney may be smarter than Perry, and perhaps Romney would even be a more skilled technocratic administrator of government. (Gingrich seems far too disorganized and flighty to engage with this part of the job too much, apart from proposing bold, fundamental changes and then moving on to something else.)

But I don’t want someone who is so confident that he is a more capable administrator of federal power. I want someone who is skeptical of federal power no matter who wields it, no matter how skilled and able an administrator he might be, even if that administrator is he himself, and so always prefers to shunt power away from the government to to the states, and their citizens.

Those are the four things Perry seems committed too. Those are the four ideas he has.

Perhaps he’s not smart enough to have more ideas than that.

Which is fine with me. I don’t want a President with many more ideas than that.

That’s how we got here, after all.

So did Mike Flynn, editor of the Big Government site. His endorsement is not an official site endorsement either, but it will carry a great deal of weight.

Over the next few years, America will face some existential questions. Will American exceptionalism endure or will we slip into a quasi-European welfare state in permanent decline? Our present trajectory is unsustainable. Even with a Republican House and, most likely, a Republican Senate after next year, the GOP in Washington doesn't seem quite up to the task of reclaiming that "shining city on the hill." They can't quite get beyond repainting a house whose foundation has cracked. We will need a President who is a strong leader with very grounded conservative convictions to navigate our way back to prosperity. One who understand that Washington has already assumed too much power and that future economic growth and personal liberty requires rolling back much of that power.

Rick Perry is that man.

So there you go. Rick Perry has some serious new media horsepower behind him. Those blogs account get hundreds of thousands,of page views among them every day and their messages will reach a lot of grassroots conservatives and Tea Party faithful. Perry will need every one of those folks to turn out as volunteers and donors to beat the GOP’s hand-picked star, Mitt Romney.

Good for him. He needs the backup. I’m not a great fan, but I wish him luck.

TwitterFacebookStumbleUponGoogle BookmarksDeliciousFriendFeedTechnorati FavoritesGoogle GmailRedditWordPressShare

Minggu, 18 Desember 2011

Clipping blog

Clipping blog


Uhhh…Greenpeace? Can We Talk About History for Just a Second?

Posted: 17 Dec 2011 01:24 PM PST

06/28/2011 © Dieter Telemans / Greenpeace

I saw this story over at Instapundit today and, I admit, it made me to a double-take.

A solid hit during the 2011 Super Bowl commercial line-up, Volkswagen’s Darth Vader ad for the new Passat has given the activists over at Greenpeace a clever idea. Since VW is acting all Dark Side about the upcoming, stringent CAFE requirements (at least, this is one way to read the situation; another is the way VW sees it, which is that the U.S. is creating rules that assist the domestic automakers while not being fair to diesel vehicles), why not take the whole thing a step further and make VW like the Empire?

Following up on Greenpeace’s VW Dark Side video, a group of UK Greenpeacers dressed as Imperial Stormtroopers were in the street to greet executives from the auto industry before a recent meeting of the European Automobile Manufacturers’ Association (Acea) in Brussels, Belgium.

A clever idea? Well, let’s see. You have “stormtroopers” laying siege to a German company in Europe with demands that they capitulate to the environmental demands of a totalitarian government. Hmm…that sounds vaguely familiar, as if perhaps we’ve seen something very much like this happen before. Stormtroopers. Germany. A party dedicated to draconian environmental rules pushed by a controlling central government. I almost have it.

Oh, wait, I remember now! These guys!

They are the Sturm Abteilung, the shock troops Adolph Hitler used to clear the field of any fascist, socialist, and communist opposition on his left so he could sweep into power. We know them better as the Nazi’s stormtroopers or by their more popular name “Brownshirts”. They became obsolete in 1934 when Hitler became Chancellor and gained control of the army and the SS, so he knocked off the SA’s leader Ernst Röhm during the Night of the Long Knives and the stormtroopers faded mostly into irrelevancy.

Volkswagen, by the way, was originally founded by the Nazi trade union, the German Labour Front. Its first vehicle was an inexpensive “people’s car” that was designed to be both small and very fuel-efficient, built by a government-backed manufacturer and marketed with government money. Few if any of the cars ever made it to the Germans who had purchased them though the program into which hundreds of thousands of them had paid. If any of that sounds familiar to you, well, then you know more about history than Greenpeace does.

Of course I don’t mean to say that Greenpeace is a Nazi organization nor that anyone in charge of this harebrained scheme wants to conquer Europe and take another shot at a worldwide Reich. On the other hand, marching stormtroopers to the headquarters of a company founded by the National Socialists’ and demanding that they embrace your specific brand of socialism it not even close to the smartest way to get your message out.

Spirit and Guts? I’ll Show You Spirit and Guts.

Posted: 17 Dec 2011 11:54 AM PST

My friend Stacy McCain likes to quote the movie Animal House when he writes about the GOP candidates and especially about his preferred guy Rick Santorum. You all probably know the scene — it’s part of one of the most famous movie monologues in history.

Over? Did you say "over"? Nothing is over until we decide it is! Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor? Hell no! … And it ain't over now. 'Cause when the goin' gets tough…  The tough get goin'! Who's with me? Let's go! …

What the f— happened to the Delta I used to know? Where's the spirit? Where's the guts, huh? This could be the greatest night of our lives, but you're gonna let it be the worst. "Ooh, we're afraid to go with you Bluto, we might get in trouble." Well just kiss my a– from now on! Not me! I'm not gonna take this.

Stacy likes to apply that to Santorum’s social conservatism, an area he believes is sorely neglected this campaign season, but I want to use it for another purpose. See, one of the things that has rankled me and a goodly number of other conservatives is how reluctant the Republican party has been to engage the progressives over the past decade. Whether it was George Bush taking shot after shot over Iraq and his tax cut, Speaker John Boehner’s capitulation to the President’s bullying during the debt ceiling debacle, or Senate Minority Leader McConnell’s utter refusal to get rough when Harry Reid refuses once again to even consider a budget, Republicans have mastered the art of the cave-in. They give up the fight at the very threat of the sound of guns or, worse yet, they roll over for a small victory and lose the bigger fights a month or two later.

“Where’s the spirit? Where’s the guts, huh?”, Stacy asks. Well, I’ll tell you where it is. It’s in the Newt Gingrich campaign. Gingrich has taken the fight to the left over the past few months like no other Republican candidate and for that reason, he ought to have your favor.

Consider the early debates. I know there have been 16 of them, and they all tend to run together, but let me remind you of Newt’s epic beatdown of Politico’s John Harris and President Obama during the September debate at the Reagan Library. Here’s the transcript.

JOHN HARRIS: Speaker Gingrich, it sounds like we have a genuine philosophical disagreement. In Massachusetts, a mandate, almost no uninsured—in Texas, a more limited approach, about a quarter uninsured. Who's got the better end of this argument?

NEWT GINGRICH: Well, I'm frankly not interested in your effort to get Republicans fighting each other.

(Harris laughs, audience applauds)

GINGRICH: The fact is—

HARRIS: Speaker Gingrich, we've got—

GINGRICH: The fact is—

HARRIS: We've got—

GINGRICH: No, no we don't—

HARRIS: We've got a choice between the individual mandate or not. Anyway, go ahead.

GINGRICH: You'd have, you would like to puff this up into some giant thing. The fact is, every person up here understands Obamacare is a disaster. It is a disaster procedurally. It was rammed through after they lost Teddy Kennedy's seat in Massachusetts. It was written badly, it was never reconciled. It can't be implemented. It is killing this economy.

And if this president had any concern for working Americans, he'd walk in Thursday night and ask us to repeal it because it's a monstrosity. Every person up here agrees with that.

(Audience applauds)

And let me just say– since I still have a little time left, let me just say—

HARRIS: Sure.

GINGRICH: I for one, and I hope all of my friends up here, going to repudiate every effort of the news media to get Republicans to fight each other to protect Barack Obama who deserves to be defeated. And all of us are committed as a team, whoever the nominee is, we are all for defeating Barack Obama.

You know what the other candidates were doing while Newt was curb-stomping the left-wing moderator and the left-wing President? They were attacking each other or whining to the moderator about how they didn’t get as many questions as they wanted.

“Where’s the spirit? Where’s the guts, huh?” How about the August debate where he slammed Fox’s Chris Wallace for the “Mickey Mouse games” when Wallace asked him about his campaign’s apparent collapse.

“I took seriously Brad’s (?) injunction to put aside the talking points and I wish you would put aside the gotcha questions…

Congress should come back Monday. They should repeal the Dodd-Frank bill. They should repeal Sarbanes-Oxley. They should repeal Obamacare. They should institute lean Six Sigma across the entire federal government — a hard idea for Washington reporters to cover, but an important idea because it is the key to American manufacturing success. I’d love to see the rest of tonight’s debate asking us about what we’d do to lead an America whose President has failed to lead instead of playing Mickey Mouse games…”

Again, the other candidates stood there while Gingrich showed the spirit and guts that we on the right, and quite frankly, all of America really want to see from a Republican presidential candidate. There was no sniveling about “equal time”. He didn’t bark like a trained seal when Wallace dangled a tasty fish in front of him. He punched back. He showed spirit and guts.

October. New Hampshire. Gingrich answered a relatively mild question about the current recession and the Occupy Whatever movement and turned it into a devastating attack against the Obama administration’s corruption.

Gingrich: “If they want to change things, the first thing to do is fire Bernanke, who is a disaster as chairman of the Federal Reserve. The second person to fire is Geithner. The fact is, in both the Bush and the Obama administrations the fix has been in. And I think it’s perfectly reasonable to be angry. But let’s be clear about who put the fix in. The fix was put in by the federal government. If you want to put people in jail, I want to second what Michele said, you ought to start with Barney Frank and Chris Dodd. And let’s look at the politicians who created the environment, the politicians who profited from the environment and the politicians who put this country in trouble.”

Charlie Rose, moderator: “Clearly, you’re not saying they should go to jail?”

Gingrich: “Well, in Chris Dodd’s case, go back to look at the Countryside deals. In Barney Frank’s case, go back and look at the lobbyist who was close to Freddie Mac. All I’m saying is, everybody in the media who wants to go after the business community ought to start by going after the politicians who were at the heart of the sickness which is weakening this country and ought to start with Bernanke, who still has not been exposed for the hundreds of billions of dollars.”

“I want to repeat this, Bernanke has in secret has spent hundreds of billions of dollars bailing out one group and not bailing another group. I don’t see how anybody in the news media demanding the kind of transparency of the Fed that you would demand of every other aspect of the federal government. And I think it is corrupt and wrong for one man to have that kind of secret power.”

“Where’s the spirit? Where’s the guts, huh?” What you didn’t get in that transcript, but is in the video right before the transcript starts is a brief but unequivocal defense of the Tea Party movement. Are you getting the picture here? Are you seeing the spirit and the guts?

One more. This is probably the best Gingrich debate moment. CBS’s Scott Pelley lobbed a biased gotcha question about “death warrants” against Americans living overseas and Gingrich drove it right back down his throat. Watch.

Spirit. Guts. I have other examples, including his incredible indictment of the MSM over their biased and economically-ignorant coverage of the Occupy Whatever movement and his detailed destruction of President Obama’s “bureaucratic socialism”, but I think I’ve made my point.

Stacy wants a candidate to show some spirit and guts. That’s exactly what Newt Gingrich has done, far more than any other candidate this year. He has attacked the President, the progressive left, and their handmaidens in the media without fear or pause while the other candidates spent their time whining for better coverage or attacking each other just like the left wants them to do. And what’s better, Newt has been right every single time.

“Where’s the spirit? Where’s the guts, huh?” Well, I know where it is. So, now, do you.

Sabtu, 17 Desember 2011

Clipping blog

Clipping blog


It’s A Shame that John Bad Mutha Shut Yo Mouth Didn’t Discover This Comet

Posted: 16 Dec 2011 11:11 AM PST

So, NASA has had its eye on a newly-discovered comet called Comet Lovejoy that has been headed directly toward the burning hot sun. Lovejoy is particularly interesting because it is one of a group of comets called Kreutz sungrazers*, believed to be fragments of a much larger comet that broke up as it passed too close to the sun. We like sungrazers because, once in a while, one of them will splash into the sun, which makes for a great picture and also gives us a chance to do a little science about what happens when you chunk a big rock into the sun.

Okay, there are other useful things we can learn, but I’m mostly interested in the pictures and the rock-chunking parts.

But, back to Lovejoy. The folks at NASA expected Lovejoy to burn up as it got very close to the sun, which would give them the chance to see (for the first time, by the way) what happens when a very large comet vaporizes completely. NASA tasked 5 satellites to observe Lovejoy, including SOHO, STEREO, and the SDO . In short, the agency put a lot of instruments on one comet, and hoped to get some good science out of it. Well, they did, but not in the way they expected.

Yesterday, Comet Lovejoy plunged toward the sun, dove into the corona, then dove right back out, apparently no worse for the trip. Let me repeat that with a couple more details. Comet Lovejoy dove into an inferno that is some 200 times hotter than the surface of the sun (to be more exact, between 2 and 4 million degrees Kelvin) with  a force of gravity roughly 28 times what it is here on Earth and flew back out not broken up into tiny pieces. Apparently, it was a heck of a lot larger than scientists believed it was — roughly 1.1 million tons — and its size is what made it impervious to the solar grinder. Well, that and its Chuck Norris nature. I guess we should all be fortunate that Lovejoy didn’t spin-kick the sun out of its grand galactic orbit.

I can’t wait to see what sort of interesting things we learn from this.

*By the way, you will not believe the gasps of amazement and admiration you will get from your friends when you drop the phrase “Kreutz sungrazers” into casual conversation. Try it at your company Christmas party (possibly with a Santa Claus reference at the same time. Bonus!).

Jumat, 16 Desember 2011

Clipping blog

Clipping blog


The Delivery Presents – A Very Weasely Christmas!

Posted: 16 Dec 2011 08:20 AM PST

I have resisted the urge to turn all of December’s shows into Odes to the Christmas Season but Episode 125 did involve a small crumbling of my resolve. I love this time of year and I freely admit that all of the seasonal sentimentality bypasses my decades of accumulated cynicism and washes over my inner ten year-old boy.

So, I sang a Christmas song, which was a more difficult undertaking than you might expect. Sure, there is plenty of Christmas music out there, but how much of it is actually written for a bass, beyond “You’re A Mean One, Mr. Grinch” (which, along with “Ol’ Man River” is one of the greatest bass melodies ever written)? Thankfully, Andy Williams was there with a tune that was just baritone enough to work. I hope you enjoy it, because I enjoyed recording it. There might be another song next week, but no promises!

The fact that the House Republicans passed an extension of the payroll tax “holiday” has driven certain members of the left completely insane, most notably Senators Boxer and Reid. We are well into the deep waters of goofiness, where Democrats claim credit for “forcing” Republicans to keep a tax cut in place and a pipeline that will provide cheap oil from a friendly country and thousands of new jobs becomes a political football. It is weasel season, the ground is thick with them, and I’ll show a couple of them to you in the first half.

If you’re intrigued by my book review in the second half, the link to Ex-Heroes by Peter Clines is right here. As with every Amazon link on my site, I’ll get a piece of the purchase price, so if you do choose to buy the book, well, you’ll just be helping me out a little bit, too! That aside, I do recommend this book highly, especially if you like superhero or zombie stories.

The Delivery - Episode 125

This posting includes an audio/video/photo media file: Download Now

Rabu, 14 Desember 2011

Clipping blog

Clipping blog


Clearing the Browser Tabs – Expanding the Jimmiesphere…One Day.

Posted: 13 Dec 2011 12:44 PM PST

Yep, it’s another big link post!

You know, I really need to do this whole blogging/podcasting/being awesome all over the Internet thing full-time. That way I could crank out four or five high-quality posts plus a whole podcast a day and the Jimmiesphere would grow like…a thing that grows a lot.

So there’s that. But that’s all for another day and another post. Right now, links!

 

TwitterFacebookStumbleUponGoogle BookmarksDeliciousFriendFeedTechnorati FavoritesGoogle GmailRedditWordPressShare